Regulation on the Write-Off and Removal from Collection of State-Owned Enterprise Assets under BP BUMN Regulation No. 1 of 2026
Introduction
On 15 October 2026, the Head of the State-Owned Enterprises Regulatory Agency (“BP BUMN”) issued BP BUMN Regulation No. 1 of 2026 on the Write-Off and Removal from Collection of State-Owned Enterprise Assets (“BP BUMN Regulation 1/2026”), which came into force on 16 October 2026. BP BUMN Regulation 1/2026 governs the criteria and procedures for writing off assets and removing receivables from collection by State-Owned Enterprises (“SOEs”), including the transfer of assets, reporting, and the implementation of loss-limitation measures (cut loss).
BP BUMN Regulation 1/2026 was promulgated to implement the provisions of Article 3C letter f, Article 40, and Article 62H of the Law on State-Owned Enterprises (“SOE Law”), as most recently amended by Law No. 16 of 2025, as well as Article 12 paragraph (1) and Article 165 paragraph (7) of Government Regulation No. 38 of 2026 on the Management of State-Owned Enterprises (“GR 38/2026”). These provisions provide the Head of BP BUMN with the authority to establish criteria for the write-off and removal from collection of SOE assets, subject to the prior approval of the President.
Key Provisions
Scope and Subject Matter
Article 2 stipulates that SOEs may write off SOE Assets and/or remove Receivables from collection. The SOE Assets subject to this regulation include Fixed Assets and Receivables. Pursuant to Article 3, the subject matter of asset write-offs in respect of Fixed Assets includes immovable Fixed Assets and movable Fixed Assets, while Receivables may be subject to both write-off and removal from collection. The subject matter of write-offs involving assets other than Fixed Assets and Receivables is determined by the Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency (“the Agency”) for Persero and by BP BUMN for Perum.
Under Article 1 points 18–19, a write-off is defined as any action to write off SOE Assets from the accounts, whereas removal from collection refers to any action by an SOE to extinguish its right to collect a claim against a debtor. Accordingly, a write-off involves removing assets from an SOE’s accounts, while removal from collection focuses on extinguishing the SOE’s right to collect from a debtor.
Criteria for Write-Offs
Type of Removal | Criteria |
Write-Off | A write-off of Fixed Assets may be carried out if any one of the following criteria is met:
A write-off of Receivables may be carried out if any one of the following criteria is met:
Article 6 requires two conditions to be satisfied: optimal collection efforts must have been undertaken, but the Receivables remain uncollected, and the circumstances must not have resulted from any fault. Article 8 explains that the adequacy of collection efforts is assessed based on:
Such assessments must be conducted in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations and/or the principles of good corporate governance. A write-off of non-performing Receivables is deemed not to have resulted from any fault if both of the following conditions are met:
|
Removal from Collection | Receivables that have already been written off may be removed from collection if any one of the following criteria is met:
|
Transfer of Fixed Assets and Assets Other than Fixed Assets and Receivables
Article 11 establishes the considerations for transferring Fixed Assets, namely the existence of any one of the following circumstances:
The assets are no longer economically or technically viable or beneficial to retain;
A more advantageous alternative or replacement is available;
The assets are designated for the Public Interest in accordance with applicable regulations and valid spatial plans;
The assets are required by a ministry or institution for the performance of state or governmental duties; or
The transfer constitutes the only available source of funds for an exceptionally urgent need.
Pursuant to Article 12, transfers may be carried out through sale, exchange, compensation, capital contribution, and/or other methods:
Method of Transfer | Description |
Public Offering | Conducted openly through announcements in print media, electronic media, and/or the SOE’s website to provide equal opportunities to all parties. The process may be conducted directly by the SOE or through and/or before an auction official in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations governing auctions. |
Limited Offering | May be conducted if a Public Offering has been held twice but the Fixed Assets remain unsold, or if certain circumstances mean that the Fixed Assets can only be sold to certain parties. |
Direct Appointment — Transfer of Fixed Assets | May be conducted if: 1. A Limited Offering has been held twice but the Fixed Assets remain unsold; 2. The Fixed Assets are designated for the Public Interest; 3. Certain circumstances mean that the Fixed Assets can only be sold to one particular party and cannot be sold to any other party; 4. The Fixed Assets are sold to another SOE or an SOE Subsidiary; or 5. The Fixed Assets are sold to a ministry or state/government institution for the performance of state or governmental duties and functions. |
Direct Appointment — Transfer of Assets Other than Fixed Assets and Receivables | May be conducted if: 1. A Limited Offering has been held twice but the assets remain unsold; 2. The assets are designated for the Public Interest; 3. Certain circumstances mean that the assets can only be sold to one particular party and cannot be sold to any other party; 4. The assets are sold to another SOE or an SOE Subsidiary; or 5. The assets are sold to a ministry or state/government institution for the performance of state or governmental duties and functions. |
Exchange | May be conducted where it constitutes an advantageous alternative or provides benefits to the SOE, or is intended to serve the Public Interest. The value of the assets owned by the other party must be at least equal to the value of the SOE’s Fixed Assets. If the value is lower, the other party must pay the difference in cash. If the value is higher, the SOE may pay the difference in cash. The Board of Directors must consider the potential utilisation of the other party’s assets being exchanged. |
Compensation | Conducted for transfers undertaken in the Public Interest. |
Capital Contribution | Implemented in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations governing the procedures for SOE capital contributions to other companies. |
Other Methods — Transfer of Fixed Assets | May be used if: 1. Sale, exchange, compensation, and capital contribution are not feasible; 2. The value of the Fixed Assets being transferred is not significant in relation to the total value of the relevant SOE’s Assets; and 3. The transfer does not disrupt operational activities, or the Fixed Assets do not constitute productive SOE Assets. Implementation requires the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders (“GMS”) for Persero or the Head of BP BUMN, in their capacity as the capital owner, for Perum, with due regard to the company’s interests. |
Other Methods — Transfer of Assets Other than Fixed Assets and Receivables | May be used if: 1. Transfer by way of sale, exchange, compensation, and capital contribution is not feasible; 2. The value of the assets being transferred is not significant in relation to the total value of the relevant SOE’s Assets; and 3. The transfer does not disrupt operational activities, or the assets do not constitute productive SOE Assets. Implementation requires the approval of the GMS for Persero or the Head of BP BUMN, in their capacity as the capital owner, for Perum, with due regard to the company’s interests. |
Documentation and Reporting of Write-Offs
SOEs are required to document and record the write-off process (Article 42). The Board of Directors must report its implementation to the Agency, in the case of Persero, or to the Head of BP BUMN, in the case of Perum, in the annual report and/or at any time as necessary (Article 43). The Agency or the Head of BP BUMN must subsequently report to the relevant body within the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (“DPR RI”) responsible for SOE affairs and to the President (Article 44).
Procedures for the Removal of Receivables from Collection
Article 45 emphasises that SOEs must continue collection efforts in respect of receivables that have already been written off before removing them from collection, in accordance with the SOE’s internal policies. Approval is required in two successive stages:
Approval from the Agency, in the case of Persero, or the Head of BP BUMN, in the case of Perum, upon submission of an application accompanied by a legal, economic, and risk assessment, as well as a statement of integrity from the Board of Directors.
Approval in accordance with the authority stipulated in the SOE’s articles of association, based on a proposal from the Board of Directors that has obtained approval at the first stage.
Documentation and reporting of the removal of Receivables from collection, including reporting to the DPR RI and the President, follow the same framework as that applicable to write-offs, as stipulated in Articles 47 to 49.
Cut Loss
Article 50 paragraphs (1) and (2) provide that SOEs may undertake cut loss, namely writing off assets below their carrying value and/or ceasing further collection efforts in respect of receivables that have already been written off, in order to prevent greater losses. Such measures may take the form of a write-off with or without the disposal of SOE Assets, as well as the removal from collection of Receivables that have already been written off.
Pursuant to Article 50 paragraph (3), the implementation of cut loss must satisfy three criteria:
It is based on an adequate analysis, evidenced by working papers, demonstrating that failure to undertake cut loss could potentially result in greater losses;
The decrease in value or loss is not attributable to the fault or negligence of the person implementing cut loss; and
There is no direct or indirect conflict of interest.
These three matters are assessed by an independent consultant or a government institution in accordance with its duties, functions, and competencies. Losses resulting from cut loss constitute losses of the SOE. The person implementing cut loss may not be held liable for such losses if all four of the following conditions are satisfied:
The losses were not caused by fault or negligence;
The management of the matter was conducted in good faith and with due care;
There was no conflict of interest; and
No personal benefit was obtained.
Transitional Provisions
Article 54 governs the continued validity of write-off approvals granted before this BP BUMN Regulation came into force. First, approvals for the write-off of Fixed Assets and SOE assets other than Fixed Assets and Receivables remain valid for the duration specified in the respective approvals. Second, approvals for the write-off of Receivables remain valid, while the process for removing such Receivables from collection must be carried out in accordance with this BP BUMN Regulation.
Closing
BP BUMN Regulation 1/2026 governs the criteria and procedures for writing off SOE Assets and removing Receivables from collection, covering the requirements for write-offs, asset transfers, approvals, documentation, and reporting, through to the implementation of cut loss. This regulation provides a framework for SOEs to carry out write-offs and removals from collection in accordance with the established criteria and procedures.
In implementing the regulation, SOEs must ensure that every write-off and removal from collection satisfies the applicable requirements, is supported by adequate documentation, and is carried out with due regard to the company’s interests and the principles of good corporate governance.
Learn More Than Just Articles with
Learning
Get more practical material through ready-to-use templates, webinar recordings, compliance checklists, and online classes from Veritask Learning.
Templates
A collection of ready-to-use standard legal documents for a range of business needs.
Webinar Recording
Access recordings of in-depth discussions with experienced legal practitioners.
Online Class
Structured classes to master specific legal topics comprehensively.
Compliance
Practical checklists to keep your business compliant with regulations.
Log in to comment
Log inWhat is
Veritask is an integrated AI-powered legal platform that helps with regulatory research, document preparation, and compliance management in one dashboard.

Free Subscription
Subscribe to receive a free weekly email with the latest legal analysis.
